Anti-doping warning
1. When did the legal requirements enter into force?
On 31-Dec-2009, the amendment to the Austrian Medicinal Products Act (Arzneimittelgesetz, AMG), Official Federal Gazette I No. 146/2009, entered into force, and with it the Art 16 para 4 (2) AMG.
Excerpt from the Austrian Medicinal Products Act [Art 16 para 4 (2)]:*
‘In addition to the information provided in accordance with para 2, the patient leaflet of proprietary medicinal products containing illicit active substances in accordance with Art 1 para 2 of the Federal Anti-Doping Act (Anti-Doping-Bundesgesetz) 2007, Official Federal Gazette I No. 30, shall contain the following note: „Die Anwendung des Arzneimittels [Bezeichnung des Arzneimittels einsetzen] kann bei Dopingkontrollen zu positiven Ergebnissen führen.“ (‘Use of the medicinal product [insert name of the medicinal product] can lead to positive results in doping tests.’) If misuse of the proprietary medicinal product for doping purposes may pose a risk to health, an additional note to this effect shall be included. These requirements do not apply to proprietary medicinal products pursuant to Art 9b.’
2. Which medicinal products are affected by the legal requirements?
In principle, Art 16 para 5 (4) applies to all medicinal products containing a substance listed in Annex I of the International Convention against Doping in Sport (Official Federal Gazette III Nr. 229/2014). This Prohibited List is regularly adapted in accordance with the state of scientific knowledge.
Excluded are medicinal products manufactured using a homoeopathic process technology. The obligation to include a warning statement applies irrespective of whether prohibition of the substance is subject to specific threshold limits, sex-specific limitations, or applies only to administration of the substance ‘in competition’ or ‘in competition in certain sports’. Also, it is irrelevant whether the substance contained in the proprietary medicinal product is qualified as an active ingredient or an excipient.
Prohibited List (Verbotsliste)
- substance list_2024| 135 KB01/03/2024
- banned list_2024| 1 MB01/03/2024
3.The substances contained in my proprietary medicinal product are not listed in the Prohibited List. Does this mean that no anti-doping warning is required for my product?
The Prohibited List is merely meant to provide assistance and is not exhaustive. Ultimately, the marketing authorisation holder will have to determine whether a substance falls into any of the categories of the List; if so, an anti-doping warning must be included, even if the substance concerned is not explicitly mentioned in the List.
4. How should the provision be implemented?
A pertinent warning is to be included in section 2 of the patient leaflet above ‘Other medicines and X.’ For better orientation, a subheading may be included:
„Die Anwendung des Arzneimittels [Bezeichnung des Arzneimittels einsetzen] kann bei Dopingkontrollen zu positiven Ergebnissen führen.“ (‘Use of the medicinal product [insert name of the medicinal product] can lead to positive results in doping tests.’)
If misuse of the medicinal product for doping purposes may pose a risk to health and a relevant explanation is medically required, this can also be included in this paragraph.
5. Does the warning to be included in the patient leaflet (PL) also have to be included in the summary of product characteristics (SmPC)?
No, Art 16 para 4 (2) of the Austrian Medicinal Products Act (Arzneimittelgesetz, AMG) does not explicitly require the warning to be included in the SmPC; the legislation merely talks about the PL.
6. Do I have to include the warning in the SmPC if I make use of the transitional provision of Section 16b of the German Medicines Act (AMG) for my medicinal product and therefore use the SmPC as a package insert instead of the package leaflet?
Yes, in this case, the warning must be included in the SmPC if the criteria for inclusion of the warning are fulfilled.
The transitional periods specified in Art 94f para 4 apply.
Excerpt from the Austrian Medicinal Products Act [Art 94f para 4]:*
’Proprietary medicinal products which, in accordance with Art 16b in the version in force before the entry into force of this federal law in the version of the Official Federal Gazette I No. 63/2009, were actually able to be placed on the market without a patient leaflet, have to fulfil the requirement of a patient leaflet until the expiry of 31-Dec-2014. On duly motivated request, the Federal Office for Safety in Health Care can extend this period.’
7. Do the provisions also apply to marketing authorisations from mutual recognition procedures (MRPs) and decentralised procedures (DCPs)?
For affected medicinal products for which the marketing authorisations have already been granted in either an MRP or DCP, the patient leaflet (PL) has to be amended as stipulated. The change has to be notified to the Federal Office for Safety in Health Care (BASG).
For marketing authorisation procedures that are still ongoing, the amended PL will be authorised as part of the dossier.
Reference: CMDh/258/2012/Rev.May 2023
9. If the regulation is also to be applied to centralised procedures?
Yes, as an object of the 'blue box'.
Reference: Notice to Applicants, Guideline on the Packinging Information of Medicinal Products for human use authorised by the Union Revision 14.8